VPC to VPC Networking Solutions:
Simplify Multi-Cloud Connectivity

Connect your VPCs - across accounts, regions, clouds - without subnet collisions, VPN overhead, or public exposure.

The problem: VPC-to-VPC connections are a mess

If you've tried to connect two VPCs, you've likely run into VPC networking challenges:
  • Subnet collisions due to overlapping CIDRs
  • Manual configuration nightmares with VPN tunnels, routing tables, and NAT gateways
  • Limited scalability across accounts or regions
  • Security exposure from requiring public IPs or public routing
  • Hours (or days) of DevOps time spent debugging connectivity issues
Connectivity starts where you can't see

The noBGP solution: effortless, secure, scalable connections

noBGP makes VPC-to-VPC networking instant, private, and programmable:
  • No subnet coordination - eliminate IP overlaps issues without changing your existing VPC CIDRs
  • No VPNs or NAT gateways - fully private connectivity without exposing your infrastructure
  • Multi-cloud, multi-region ready - connect any VPCs, from any cloud, anwhere
  • Infrastructure as code - deploy with a few lines of code as you deploy compute and storage resources
  • Security by design - no public IPs, no attack surface

Who it's for

noBGP makes everyone's lives simpler and more secure.
  • Software Developers connect services across environments without worrying about IP conflicts, subnet overlaps, or manual network configs.
  • Cloud architects simplify multi-cloud connectivity by eliminating IP planning and overlapping subnet issues.
  • DevOps teams enable fast, reliable service-to-service networking without the need for VPNs, NAT rules, or port forwarding.
  • Platform teams deliver scalable, conflict-free networking as code, so environments stay reproducible and secure.
  • CISOs and IT security teams eliminate attack surface. No public IPs, no exposed ports. Network privacy by design.
Job roles that benefit from noBGP

How noBGP compares to traditional networking solutions

When evaluating VPC connectivity options, organizations typically consider several approaches. Here's how noBGP stacks up against the most common alternatives:

noBGP vs. VPC Peering

VPC Peering creates a direct network connection between two VPCs, but comes with significant limitations:
  • CIDR conflicts: Peering fails if VPCs have overlapping IP ranges, forcing you to redesign your network architecture.
  • Limited scalability: Each peering connection is point-to-point, creating a mesh complexity that becomes unmanageable with multiple VPCs.
  • Single-cloud limitation: Most cloud providers only support peering within their own ecosystem.
  • No transitive routing: VPC A cannot reach VPC C through VPC B, requireing multiple direct connections.
noBGP advantages: Works with overlapping CIDRs, scales to hundreds of VPCs, support multi-cloud environments, and enables transitive connectivity through a unified network overlay.

noBGP vs. Transit Gateway

Transit Gateway (AWS) acts as a central hub for connecting multiple VPCs and on-premises networks:
  • Still requires CIDR coordination: Overlapping IP ranges cause routing conflicts.
  • Cloud vendor lock-in: Each cloud provider has their own version (Azure VirtualWAN, GCP Network Connectivity Center).
  • Complex routing management: Route tables and propagation rules become difficult to manage at scale.
  • Regional limitations: Cross-region connectivity requires additional configuration and costs.
noBGP advantages: Eliminates IP planning requirements, works across any cloud provider, simplified routing with automatic path optimization, and provides seamless global connectivity.

noBGP vs. AWS PrivateLink

PrivateLink enables private connectivity to services without exposing traffic to the public internet:
  • Service-specific: Designed for connecting to specific services, not general VPC-to-VPC communication.
  • One-way connectivity: Typically allows access to services but not bidirectional network communication.
  • AWS-centric: While other clouds have similar services, they're not interoperable.
  • Limited to specific use cases: Great for accessing managed services privately, but doesn't solve general networking challenges.
noBGP advantages: Provides full bidirectional network connectivity, works for any application or service, enables true multi-cloud architecture, and supports complex network topologies.

noBGP vs. Traditional VPN Solutions

VPN Tunnels have been the go-to solution for private connectivity across networks:
  • Management overhead: Requires configuration and maintenance of VPN gateways, tunnels, and routing.
  • Performance bottlenecks: VPN gateways can become bandwidth and latency bottlenecks.
  • High availability complexity: Setting up redundant VPN connections requires careful planning and additional costs.
  • Public IP dependency: Most VPN solutions require public IP addresses, increasing attack surface.
  • Manual scaling: Adding new connections requires manual configuration and coordination.
noBGP advantages: Zero gateway management, optimized performance with automatic path selection, built-in redundancy and failover, no public IP requirements, and automatic scaling as you add new VPCs.

The noBGP difference

Unlike traditional approaches that work at the infrastructure level, noBGP creates an intelligent private network that sits above your existing VPC infrastructure. noBGP's revolutionary solutions enables:
  • No infrastructure changes: Your existing VPCs, subnets, and security groups remain unchanged.
  • Automatic IP translation: Applications use their original IP addresses while noBGP handles routing between overlapping networks.
  • Intelligent routing: Traffic automatically takes the optimal path based on your criteria, not BGP's best effort. Route based on latency, throughput, cost, availability, security, network sovereignty, and compliance.
  • Universal compatibility: Works with any cloud provider, region, or on-premises environment.

When to choose each solution

  • Choose VPC Peering when: You have 2-3 VPCs in the same cloud provider with non-overlapping CIDRs and simple connectivity requirements.
  • Choose Transit Gateway when: You're heavily invested in a single cloud ecosystem and can coordinate IP addressing across all VPCs.
  • Choose PrivateLink when: You need private access to specific managed services rather than general network connectivity.
  • Choose traditional VPN when: You're connecting to legacy systems that require standard IPSec protocols.
  • Choose noBGP when: You want the simplest, most scalable solution that works across any environment without architectural constraints.

Frequently Asked Questions

What cloud providers does noBGP support?

noBGP works with all cloud and data center providers including AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle, Cachengo, Equinix, and more. There is no technology lock-in to specific vendors. Migrate your workloads to any location including on-premise environments.

Does noBGP replace my VPN?

Yes, noBGP creates private, encrypted connections without the complexity of VPN tunnels.

Do I need to reconfigure my VPCs?

No. You can keep your existing CIDR blocks - even overlapping ones.

How is this different from VPC Peering?

VPC Peering requires CIDR coordination and doesn't scale well. noBGP works even with overlapping IP ranges and simplifies operations. noBGP also works across accounts within a cloud provider or across multiple cloud providers.

Reinventing networking to be simple, secure, and private.
Register your free account now
noBGP company logo
Choose your Path - tagline logo
noBGP, Inc. © 2025, All rights reserved
noBGP company logo
noBGP, Inc.
Choose your path

© 2025, All rights reserved